Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of sow herds participating in the studya

From: Longitudinal piglet sampling in commercial sow farms highlights the challenge of PRRSV detection

 

Farm A

Farm B

Farm C

Farm D

Farm E

Farm F

Sow inventory

3000

3000

3000

3000

6000

3300

Distance to the nearest farm

800 m

8 km

800 m

3.2 km

>  32 km

2.4 km

Farrowing rooms (crates/room)

18 (28)

15 (24)

14 (28)

20 (32)

20 (56)

13 (56)

Most recent PRRSV outbreak

18 months

6 months

6 months

6 months

3 months

5 months

PRRSV RFLP patternb

1–7-4

1–10-4

1–7-4

1–7-4

1–8-4

1–7-4

PRRSV control

 - PRRSV MLV

Quarterly

Quarterly

Quarterly

Quarterly

Yes

No

 - Live virus inoculation

No

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

 - Shower in/shower out

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

 - Supplies disinfected at entry

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

 - Gilt quarantine

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Surveillance specimens

 - Processing fluids (PF)

  Weeks sampled

1–19

1–19

1–19

1–19

1–38

1–18

  Total PF samples

87

83

74

94

167

56

 - Family oral fluids (FOF)

  Weeks sampled

9–11, 13

11–14, 16–19

13–19

12–18

3–5, 7–8, 10–12, 14–16, 18, 20–22, 25–31, 33

1–9, 11, 12, 14–17

  Total FOF samples

109

480

439

573

498

301

 - Serum

  Sampling period (weeks)

Not done

Not done

Not done

Not done

14, 18, 22, 24–31, 33

8, 12

  Total pooledc serum samples

    

108

12

  1. a All farms endemically infected with PRRSV, used commercial modified live vaccine (MLV) and/or live PRRSV inoculation (LVI), and practiced continuous farrowing
  2. b Based on PRRSV ORF5 sequencing
  3. c Pools of 5 serum samples