Skip to main content

Table 2 Basic assumptions on productivity and additional costs for management and housing interventions tested in the bio-economic model

From: Economic feasibility of interventions targeted at decreasing piglet perinatal and pre-weaning mortality across European countries

Intervention name 1

Description of an intervention

Expected effect on mortality reduction (%)

Cost of intervention

Perinatal mortality

Pre-weaning mortality

Housing interventions

(1) Ventilation

Mechanical ventilation in gestation unit

3.8% [16]

 

Fixed costs up by 1% (own calculations)

(2) Interior

Interior design of gestation unit renewed every 12.5 years

2.6% [16, 18]

 

Fixed costs up by 5% (own calculations and [38])

Management and housing intervention

(3) Assistance

Drying and placing piglets close to udder, 3 heating lamps per litter

2.4% [18]

 

Labor input and fixed costs up by 10 and 0.25%, respectively (own calculations and [39])

Management interventions

(4) Enrichment

Oak attached to a chain (3 per pen), straw pellets supplementation

4% [20]

 

Cost of feed up by 1%, cost of enrichment set at €1.8/sow (own calculations and [40])

(5) Animal-friendly handling

Sows experienced music (06.00–18.00) and backscratching (15 s/sow/d) during farrowing and lactation period

 

3.3% [19, 21]

Additional 9 min labor per litter [41]

  1. 1All interventions were assumed to be implemented independently