Skip to main content

Table 3 Measurable outcomes for the lung scoring systems for the evaluation of cranioventral pulmonary consolidation (CVPC) using the scoring method developed by Madec and Derrien ([20]; gold standard) and the four simplified scenarios

From: Value of simplified lung lesions scoring systems to inform future codes for routine meat inspection in pigs

Scenario ID

Measurable outcome

Prevalence (%)

% of affected lung surface

N lobes affected

Mean (± SD)

Median

(min.–max.)

Mean (± SD)

Median

(min.–max.)

Mean (± SD)

Median

(min.–max.)

Gold standard

17 (± 1.5)

13

(0–65)

6.6 (± 2.75)

6.2

(1.25–17.30)

1.7 (± 0.48)

1.6

(1.00–3.2)

Scenario 1

Presence or absence of CVPC

17 (± 1.5)

13

(0–65)

Naa

Na

Na

Na

Scenario 2

German scoring system

17 (± 1.5)

13

(0–65)

8.5 (± 3.23)

8.0

(5.00–23.00)

Na

Na

Scenario 3

Number of lung lobes affected

17 (± 1.5)

13

(0–65)

24.0b (± 6.80)

23.5 (14.29–45.71)

1.7 (± 0.48)

1.6

(1.00–3.20)

Scenario 4

Number of lung lobes affected excluding the intermediate lobe

17 (± 1.5)

12

(0–65)

28.0c

(± 7.83)

27.4

(16.67–53.33)

1.7 (± 0.47)

1.7

(1.00–3.20)

  1. aNot applicable
  2. b% of lung surface affected was calculated attributing the same lobe weight to all lobes (1/7)
  3. c% of lung surface affected was calculated attributing the same lobe weight to all lobes (1/6)