Skip to main content

Table 4 Logistic regression model for intrinsic and extrinsic variables related to forelimb skin abrasion in piglets at 5 days of age

From: Foot lesions and forelimb skin abrasions in suckling piglets: development and risk factors

Risk categories

Heel bruising

Univariable model

Multivariable model

Score 0/1/2

Score 3/4/5

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

n

%

n

%

Lower bound

Upper bound

Lower bound

Upper bound

Piglet's sex

p = 0.6232

p = 0.6742

 Female

141

27.49

372

72.51

1

 × 

 × 

1

 × 

 × 

 Male

148

29.42

355

70.58

0.923

0.671

1.270

0.933

0.647

1.291

Litter size

p = 0.1080

p = 0.1726

  < 16

170

32.44

121

23,22

1

 × 

 × 

1

 × 

 × 

  ≥ 16

354

67.56

400

76.78

1.604

0.901

2.856

1.473

0.844

2.572

Floor

p = 0.0246

p = 0.0176

 RML*

121

22.62

414

77.38

1

 × 

 × 

1

 × 

 × 

 PSL*

170

33.33

340

66.67

0.0527

0.302

0.921

0.514

0.297

0.890

Body weight day 1 (kg)

p = 0.1711

p = 0.1861

  ≤ 1.20

114

35.85

204

64.15

1

 × 

 × 

1

 × 

 × 

 1.21–1.50

82

26.45

228

73.55

1.253

0.822

1.907

1.427

0.917

2.221

  ≥ 1.51

89

29.18

216

70.82

0.820

0.516

1.304

1.016

0.619

1.669

Average daily gain until day 5 (kg)

p = 0.1101

p = 0.0742

 ≤ 0.110

78

26.35

218

73.65

1

 × 

 × 

1

 × 

 × 

 0.111–0.0160

91

29.55

217

70.45

0.843

0.550

1.291

0.797

0.518

1.225

  ≥ 0.161

112

36.48

195

63.52

0.628

0.403

0.979

0.578

0.359

0.929

  1. *RML soft rubber with litter (wood shaves), PSL plastic slats