Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Viral and bacterial investigations on the aetiology of recurrent pig neonatal diarrhoea cases in Spain

Porcine Health Management20184:5

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-018-0083-8

  • Received: 9 October 2017
  • Accepted: 23 January 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Neonatal diarrhoea represents a major disease problem in the early stages of animal production, increasing significantly pre-weaning mortality and piglets weaned below the target weight. Enteric diseases in newborn piglets are often of endemic presentation, but may also occur as outbreaks with high morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to assess the frequency of different pathogens involved in cases of recurrent neonatal diarrhoea in Spain.

Results

A total of 327 litters from 109 sow farms located in Spain with neonatal recurrent diarrhoea were sampled to establish a differential diagnosis against the main enteric pathogens in piglets. In total, 105 out of 109 (96.3%) case submissions were positive to one of the examined enteric organisms considered potentially pathogenic (Escherichia coli, Clostridium perfringens types A and C, Transmissible gastroenteritis virus [TGEV], Porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus [PEDV] or Rotavirus A [RVA]). Fifty-eight out of 109 (53.2%) submissions were positive for only one of these pathogens, 47 out of 109 (43.1%) were positive for more than one pathogen and, finally, 4 out of 109 (3.7%) were negative for all these agents. Escherichia coli strains were isolated from all submissions tested, but only 11 of them were classified into defined pathotypes. Clostridium perfringens type A was detected in 98 submissions (89.9%) and no C. perfringens type C was found. Regarding viruses, 47 (43.1%) submissions were positive for RVA, 4 (3.7%) for PEDV and none of them for TGEV.

Conclusion

In conclusion, C. perfringens type A, E. coli and RVA were the main pathogens found in faeces of neonatal diarrheic piglets in Spain.

Keywords

  • Neonatal diarrhoea
  • Spain
  • Frequency
  • C. perfringens
  • E. coli
  • Rotavirus
  • Coronavirus

Background

Neonatal diarrhoea is one of the most frequent clinical signs in young piglets, increasing significantly pre-weaning mortality and the number of piglets weaned below the target weight [1]. Enteric diseases in newborn piglets are often endemic, but may also occur as outbreaks with high morbidity and mortality [2, 3]. Although the latter ones have a major economic impact in the short-term, the economic consequences of endemic and recurrent neonatal diarrhoea can also be substantial. In studies conducted in Sweden and Denmark, diarrhoea was estimated to account for 5–24% of the overall pre-weaning mortality [4] and for a reduction in average daily gain (ADG) by 8–14 g/day in the first week of life [5, 6]. Based on these production losses, the cost of neonatal diarrhoea was recently estimated to be 134 € per sow per year in affected herds [7].

Diarrhoea can be described as faeces with excess of water in relation to faecal dry matter [8]. Clinical signs and impact of enteric diseases in newborn piglets vary depending on the infectious agent/s involved, as well as the susceptibility of piglets to infection [9]. Regardless of the cause, a rapid loss of water, electrolytes and nutrients do occur. Given the limited body reserves of the newborn piglet, this situation quickly leads to a deleterious condition of the piglet that may die in a matter of hours. Therefore, acute diarrhoea in the newborn pig should always receive immediate attention [10].

Diarrhoea is a clinical sign and its treatment depends on the nature of the cause; therefore, a definitive diagnosis is required to take the proper control approach. Once management problems are solved, the most common causes of enteric problems are infections by one or more pathogens or changes in the microbiota [9]. The differential diagnosis includes viruses, bacteria and parasites. Among infectious causes of neonatal diarrhoea (first week of age), both bacteria and viruses may play a significant role, not only by separate but also in co-infection [9, 11].

The most widespread viral infection causing diarrhoea in neonatal swine is Rotavirus type A (RVA), although types B and C are also linked to enteric diseases as well [1214]. RVA is often detected as the sole infectious agent, but the majority of studies are based on qualitative detection of RVA without histologic verification; this fact implies that the causative significance of this virus is often unknown. Transmissible gastroenteritis (TGE) virus (TGEV) and Porcine epidemic diarrhoea (PED) virus (PEDV) can also cause diarrhoea in piglets [15]. TGEV is a cause of disease in most pig-producing areas of the world [16], but the clinical impact of TGEV in Europe is low since 1980s–90s due to the extensive spread of the closely related Porcine respiratory coronavirus (PCRV), which resulted in immunological cross-protection [16]. PEDV was recognized for the first time in Europe during the seventies, but a major concern re-appeared in the European swine production in 2014 when the virus was detected in several countries causing high piglet mortality and significant economic losses [17]. Outbreaks of PED in suckling piglets are clinically indistinguishable from outbreaks of TGE [18].

A number of bacteria are related to neonatal diarrhoea in piglets. Escherichia coli is probably the most important one, responsible for a range of different diseases in both man and animals [19]. The main pathotype of E. coli responsible for intestinal disease in pigs is enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) [20]. However, there are other E. coli pathotypes also linked with piglet disease, such as enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) and those known as attaching-and-effacing (A/E) E. coli [21]. Clostridium perfringens is another important diarrhoeagenic pathogen, which is classified into five groups (A to E) based on the production of the major toxin types alpha, beta, epsilon and iota [22]. C. perfringens type C produces α- and β-toxin and can cause high mortality rates in newborns [23]. C. perfringens type A produces α-toxin and ß2-toxin; besides being considered a cause of neonatal diarrhoea, it is also considered part of the normal intestinal microbiota of piglets [24].

The objective of the present work was to investigate the presence of viral (RVA, TGEV and PEDV) and bacterial (different E. coli pathotypes, and C. perfringens types A and C) pathogens associated to cases of recurrent neonatal diarrhoea in Spain.

Methods

Case selection

A total of 327 litters from 109 sow farms located in Spain that experienced neonatal recurrent diarrhoea were sampled to establish a differential diagnosis against enteric pathogens in piglets. Therefore, a convenience sampling was designed; the inclusion criterion for all veterinarians submitting samples was the presence of diarrhoea during the first week of age in a repeated fashion through different batches.

Five piglets per litter from three litters with diarrhoea were sampled in each studied farm. Selected piglets were not treated with antibiotics and their faeces were collected individually and pooled subsequently in a plastic tube (total of 3 pools per farm, one per each litter). A swab in Amies medium was taken from each plastic tube, which was previously hand-shaken. Both samples, swab and plastic tube, were sent to IVD Innovative Veterinary Diagnostics (IVD) Laboratory (Germany) to check for several enteric pathogens causing neonatal diarrhoea. The shipment was sent by plane, with a delivery in 24 h and using a cool pack in the box during the transportation.

Bacteriological isolation

Faeces from the swab were streaked out on blood agar (Columbia agar with sheep blood; Oxoid: PB5008A) and Gassner agar (Oxoid: PO5021A) for the isolation of Escherichia coli. Inoculated plates were incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 24 h. Suspected E. coli isolated colonies were confirmed by morphological characteristics; in addition, blue colonies (lactose-positive) on Gassner agar were further confirmed by negative oxidase testing. Haemolysin presence was identified by haemolysis on blood agar.

For the isolation of C. perfringens, faeces from the swab were streaked out on plates containing Schaedler agar with sheep blood (Oxoid: PB5034A) and incubated anaerobically (AnaeroGen, Oxoid: AN0035A) at 37 °C for 24 to 48 h. C. perfringens was identified because of the double-zoned haemolysis, typical colony morphology and butyric acid smell. Suspected isolated colonies were further confirmed by PCR genotyping using the species-specific cpa-gene coding for the α-toxin.

Escherichia coli Genotyping

E. coli species were characterized by the detection of the E. coli species-specific glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase gene gapA [25], which was the internal amplification and positive control in the multiplex PCR used for genotyping. For genotyping purposes, a single E. coli colony from a pure agar culture was selected and suspended in 150 μL lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.05% Tween 20, 240 μg/mL Proteinase K with 0.5% Triton X-100, and then incubated for 60 min at 60 °C. Subsequently, the suspension was heated at 97 °C for 15 min and the lysate was cooled at room temperature. A total of 1.5 μL of this lysate were used as a template for genotyping PCR methods. Virulence associated genes listed in Table 1 were investigated for E. coli isolates by multiplex PCRs [26]. Pathotypes were defined following the combination of detected genes [21].
Table 1

Target genes of Escherichia coli virulence factors detected by multiplex PCRs

Bacterial components or products

Target genes

Virulence factors

Fimbriae

faeG (F4)

F4 fimbriae

fanC (F5)

F5 fimbriae

fasA (F6)

F6 fimbriae

fedA (F18)

F18 fimbriae

fim41A (F41)

F41 fimbriae

fimH (F1)

type 1 fimbriae

fimA (F1)

type 1 fimbriae

Adhesins

papC

P fimbriae

aidA (AIDA)

AIDA-I autotransporter adhesin

paa

porcine attaching-effacing associated protein

eaeA (intimin)

intimin

Toxins

eltB (LTI)

heat-sensitive enterotoxin

estA (STI)

heat-resistant enterotoxin

estB (STII)

heat-resistant enterotoxin

astA (EAST)

heat-resistant enterotoxin

stx2e

Shiga toxin variant 2e

cdtB

cytolethal distending toxin

cnf1

cytotoxic necrotizing factor type 1

Others

iucD

aerobactin siderophore

escV

type III secretion system

pic

serin protease autotransporter

Clostridium perfringens Immunoblotting and genotyping

For the immunoblotting, 5 colonies were suspended in 5 mL TYCG-medium plus TYCG-supplement (liquid media for Clostridium spp.) and incubated 6 to 8 h at 37 °C under anaerobic conditions; 1 mL was centrifuged at 11.000 x g for 5 min. The supernatant was used to detect α-, β- and β2-toxins by immunoblotting [27]; α and β toxin presence was defined by positive or negative, and only β2 production was semi quantitatively recorded (strongly positive, positive, weakly positive and negative) [28]. For genotyping purposes, a single colony from a pure agar culture was selected and suspended in 150 μL lysis buffer, incubated for 90 min at 60 °C and then heated at 97 °C for 15 min. Lysate cooled at room temperature and genotyping (cpa, cpb, and cpb2 genes) was performed following a previously published method [28].

Virological analyses

Nucleic acid was extracted from faecal samples using an RNA-DNA isolation kit (MagMAX Pathogen RNA/DNA Kit; Life Technologies GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany). Briefly, 0.5 g of faeces was suspended in 1 mL PBS and vortexed vigorously for 3 min, until the solution was fully suspended. For a separation of phases, it was centrifuged at 100 x g for 3 to 5 s. A total of 200 μL of the solution was transferred to a tube with 500 μL prepared lysis/binding solution of the RNA-DNA isolation kit. It was vortexed vigorously for 5 min and then centrifuged at 16.000 x g for 3 min to clarify the lysate. Nucleic acid isolation was performed with an automated nucleic acid isolation processor (MagMAX™ Express-96 Magnetic Particle Processor; Life Technologies GmbH) based on magnetic bead technology, according the manufacturer’s protocol and instructions. Extracted nucleic acid was analysed by PCR methodologies.

RVA RNA was detected by a previously described real-time RT-PCR [29]. PEDV and TGEV were detected by a real-time multiplex RT-PCR for the simultaneously detection of both viruses, following manufacturer recommendations (virotype PEDV/TGEV RT-PCR Kit, Qiagen, Denmark).

Results

Globally, 105 out of 109 (96.3%) herds were positive to at least one of the examined enteric pathogens (pathogenic E. coli, C. perfringens types A and C, TGEV, PEDV or RVA). Fifty-eight out of 109 (53.2%) submissions were positive for only one of these pathogens, 47 out of 109 (43.1%) were positive for more than one pathogen and, finally, 4 out of 109 (3.7%) were negative for all these agents.

E. coli strains were isolated from all submissions tested. However, only 11 of them were classified into defined pathotypes (ETEC and EPEC). Specifically, 9 isolates were classified as ETEC and 2 as EPEC (Table 2). Within ETEC isolates, 7 different virulence factor profiles were found; among ETEC strains, the most frequently detected virulence factors were STII (7 isolates), STI (7 isolates) and F4 (5 isolates). Both EPEC strains showed the same combination of virulence factors, Intimin and escV.
Table 2

Patothypes of the 11 E. coli strains isolated in the present study and their combinations of virulence factors detected by PCR

Pathotype

Combination of virulence factors

Number of isolates

ETEC

F4, STI, STII

2

AIDA, STII

2

F4, LTI, STI, STII

1

F5, intimin, STI

1

F18, paa, STI, STII

1

F4, AIDA, LTI, STI, STII

1

F4, LTI, STI

1

EPEC

Intimin, escV

2

ETEC enterotoxigenic, E. coli EPEC enteropathogenic E. coli

C. perfringens type A was isolated from 98 submissions (89.9%), which were all of them cpa positive by PCR. No isolation of C. perfringens type C was found, and all submissions resulted negative to cpb gene detection by PCR. The cpb2 toxin gene was found in 95 out of 98 (96.9%) C. perfringens type A isolates. By immunoblotting of these 95 strains, 20 isolates were β2 toxin strongly positive, 51 positive, 17 weakly positive and 7 negative. The result of production of α toxin by immunoblotting was positive in 34 isolates.

Regarding viruses, 47 out of 109 (43.1%) submissions were positive for RVA, 4 (3.7%) for PEDV and none of them for TGEV.

Table 3 summarizes all combinations of pathogens found in the studied diarrhoea cases. Noteworthy, pathogenic E. coli were only found in combination with other pathogens, and the maximum number of pathogens found in one submission was four (ETEC, C. perfringens type A, RVA and PEDV).
Table 3

Combinations of different pathogens found in neonatal cases of diarrhoea in Spain

Combination of pathogens

Number of cases (percentage)

RVA and C. perfringens type A

34 (31.2%)

ETEC, RVA and C. perfringens type A

4 (3.7%)

PEDV and C. perfringens type A

2 (1.8%)

ETEC and C. perfringens type A

3 (2.7%)

ETEC, RVA, C. perfringens type A and PEDV

1 (0.92%)

ETEC, C. perfringens type A and PEDV

1(0.92%)

EPEC, RVA and C. perfringens type A

1 (0.92%)

EPEC and C. perfringens type A

1 (0.92%)

Total

47 (43.1%)

PEDV Porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus, RVA Rotavirus type A, ETEC enterotoxigenic E. coli, EPEC enteropathogenic E. coli

Discussion

The emergence of the modern pig production, with more intensified farming, has been paralleled with an increase of neonatal piglet diarrhoea prevalence [20]. Neonatal enteric problems in a herd are usually the result from the interaction of multiple factors that need to be examined to find rational means for intervention. Major determinants for the manifestation of neonatal diarrhoea include factors such as passive immunity transferred by colostrum and milk [30], environmental temperature [31] and humidity [21], management [32] and infection pressure by specific pathogens of the herd [32]. The present study focused on different enteric pathogens able to cause neonatal diarrhoea in piglets in an important European pig producing country such as Spain, with specific focus on frequency of infections and co-infections. It was not possible, however, to address the specific role of other non-tested pathogens as well as non-infectious factors in the studied cases.

Both viral and/or bacterial pathogens were found in 96% of the submissions, which represents a fairly high number of cases with at least one infectious agent present. C. perfringens type A is considered rather an ubiquitous bacteria in the pig intestinal tract [24]. Therefore, it is difficult to predict if it acted as primary pathogen or its multiplication was triggered by other infectious or non-infectious factors. In consequence, it was not possible to assess in which number of submissions the primary cause was a pathogen. Noteworthy, infectious diarrhoea in newborn piglets is usually related to the presence of a single pathogen and mixed infections are considered less common [33]. However, almost half of the cases (43.1%) of the present study corresponded to mixed infections, with C. perfringens type A being present in all these cases.

Regarding viruses, RVA was the most frequently detected agent. Rotavirus is among the most prevalent pathogens in cases of neonatal diarrhoea, and is often detected as the sole infectious agent [34]. In fact, several recent studies have described such high prevalence in pigs in Europe and North America [13; 14]. In contrast, only 4 submissions were positive to PEDV. After the 1980s, problems with PEDV in Europe declined and disease outbreaks have been occasionally seen during the last decades [17]. In 2013, PEDV was introduced for the first time on the American continent and resulted in severe outbreaks of disease in the naïve population [17]. Recently, PEDV isolates similar to the S-INDEL variants described in America have also been detected in Europe [35, 36]. Regarding the occurrence of PED in 2014–2015 recorded by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Network, countries voluntarily reported 245 cases of pig herds meeting the PED case definition and 71 pig herds with RT-PCR confirmation of PEDV-genome; such PEDV-confirmed cases were found in Austria, Belgium, Spain, France, Italy, the Netherlands and Germany (EFSA, 2015). As expected, TGEV was not found in any of the submissions. TGEV is a cause of disease in most pig-producing areas of the world [16]. However, outbreaks of TGE in Europe are rare, probably due to immunological cross-protection induced by PRCV, which is apparently ubiquitous in the continent [16].

ETEC has commonly been incriminated as the main aetiological agent of neonatal diarrhoea [37], although a recent survey conducted in Canada has suggested that the clinical importance of neonatal E. coli enteric problems have decreased during recent years [34]. Pathogenic pathotypes of E. coli were found only in 10% of the submissions in the present study which may reflect such a decrease in prevalence. Anyway, it is known that the major pathotype of E. coli responsible for intestinal disease in pigs is ETEC [20] and these data fit with the results of the current work, since 9 out of 11 E. coli pathotypes were ETEC (with major virulence factors being STII and STI toxins and F4 fimbriae). Curiously, two of the E. coli isolates consisted of EPEC strains, which are usually related with post-weaning diarrhoea [21]. However, EPEC isolates from neonatal diarrhoea have been already described [38, 39]. In contrast, all tested submissions yielded non-pathogenic E. coli strains, which is in line with other published works. In a Danish study on neonatal diarrhoea in four commercial swine herds, non-haemolytic E. coli were the most predominant isolate obtained after aerobic culturing of both diarrhoeic and non-diarrhoeic piglets [40]. This was also the case in a similar Swedish study on neonatal diarrhoea, where non-haemolytic E. coli was found in all piglets [41]. The prevalence of classical porcine ETEC in both Scandinavian studies was very low in diarrhoeic piglets (less than 3%). This fact can be associated to modern swine production, in which pre-farrowing vaccination of sows against E. coli fimbriae antigens (F4, F5 and F6) is common.

C. perfringens type A was found in most of the submissions (89.9%), with detection of the cpb2 gene by PCR in the majority of cases. Moreover, in 88 cases such results were reinforced with the production in vitro of the β2 toxin by immunoblotting. This result fits well with a recent report from Poland [42], who found a 91.4% prevalence of C. perfringens type A at herd level. Such a high rate of detection raises the question of this bacterium as a true cause of diarrhoea or part of the microbiota, which may be up-regulated in enteric disease scenarios. In fact, the impact of α and β2 toxins on disease pathogenesis has not been conclusively answered [43]. In contrast, C. perfringens type C was not detected in any of the samples. This bacterium causes disease in piglets in many areas of the world, but in a global perspective, it is considered much less important than other enteric pathogens [22]. In the same Polish survey, for example, they found a 1.4% herd prevalence of this bacterium [42]. Probably, during recent years, C. perfringens type C infections are rare in cases of neonatal diarrhoea due to sow vaccination [34]. Indeed, in Spain, routine vaccination of sows pre-farrowing with beta toxoid vaccines is usual.

Conclusions

In summary, the present study shows that RVA, ETEC and C. perfringens type A are the main pathogens involved in persistent neonatal diarrhoea in Spain. In almost half of the cases, more than one enteric pathogen was found. Noteworthy, pathogenic E. coli was only found in combination with other pathogens, and the maximum number of pathogens found in one submission, occurring once, was four.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all swine veterinarians who submitted samples for the study. Susana Mesonero-Escuredo is a resident of the European College of Porcine Health Management (ECPHM). The funding from CERCA Programme (Generalitat de Catalunya) to IRTA is also acknowledged.

Funding

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Authors’ contributions

SME and CC designed the study protocol. KSM performed the laboratory analyses. SME and JS analysed the results and drafted the manuscript; CC and KSM critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest. This study did not use or evaluate any commercial product.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
IDT Biologika SL, Gran Vía Carles III, 84, 3°, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
(2)
IVD Innovative Veterinary Diagnostics (IVD GmbH) Albert-Einstein-Str. 5, 30926 Seelze, Germany
(3)
Departament de Sanitat i Anatomia Animals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
(4)
UAB, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA, IRTA-UAB), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain

References

  1. Holland RE. Some infectious causes of diarrhea in young farm animals. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1990 Oct;3(4):345–75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Morin M, Turgeon D, Jolette J, Robinson Y, Phaneuf JB, Sauvageau R, Beauregard M, Teuscher E, Higgins R, Lariviere S. Neonatal diarrhea of pigs in Quebec: infectious causes of significant outbreaks. Can J Comp Med. 1983;47(1):11–7.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Svensmark B, Jorsal S, Nielsen K, Willeberg P. Epidemiological studies of piglet diarrhoea in intensively managed Danish sow herds. I Pre-weaning diarrhoea Acta Vet Scand. 1988;30(1):43–53.Google Scholar
  4. Svendsen J, Bille N, Nielsen N, Larsen J, Riising H. Preweaning mortality in pigs. Diseases of the gastrointestinal tract in pigs. Nordisk Veterinär. 1975;27(2):85–101.Google Scholar
  5. Kongsted H, Stege H, Toft N, Nielsen JP. The effect of new neonatal porcine Diarrhoea syndrome (NNPDS) on average daily gain and mortality in 4 Danish pig herds. BMC Vet Res. 2014;10(1):90.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Johansen M, Alban L, Kjærsgård HD, Bækbo P. Factors associated with suckling piglet average daily gain. Prev Vet Med. 2004;63(1):91–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Sjölund M, Zoric M, Wallgren P. Financial impact of disease on pig production. Part III. Gastrointestinal disorders. In: Proceedings of 6th European symposium of porcine health management. Italy: Sorrento; 2014. p. 189.Google Scholar
  8. Brown CC, Baker DC, Barker IK. Alimentary system. In: Grant Maxie M, editor. Jubb, Kennedy, and Palmer's pathology of domestic animals, vol. 2. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2007. p. 81–2.Google Scholar
  9. Thomson JR, Friendship RM. Digestive system. In: Zimmerman J, Karriker LA, Ramirez A, Schwartz KJ, Stevenson GW, editors. Diseases of swine. 10th. ed: Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. p. 216–8.Google Scholar
  10. Muirhead Michael R, Alexander Thomas JL. Managing Pig Health. In: Chapter 8: managing health in the farrowing and sucking period. second ed; 2013. p. 269–327.Google Scholar
  11. Wang X, Ren W, Nie Y, Cheng L, Tan W, Wang C, Wei L, Zhang R, Yan G. A novel watery diarrhoea caused by the co-infection of neonatal piglets with Clostridium perfringens type a and Escherichia coli (K88, 987P). Vet J. 2013;197(3):812–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Vlasova AN, Amimo JO, Saif LJ. Porcine rotaviruses: epidemiology, immune responses and control strategies. Viruses. 2017;9(3):48.Google Scholar
  13. Theuns S, Vyt P, Desmarets LMB, Roukaerts IDM, Heylen E, Zeller M, Matthijnssens J, Nauwynck HJ. Presence and characterization of pig group a and C rotaviruses in feces of Belgian diarrheic suckling piglets. Virus Res. 2016;213:172–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Marthaler D, Homwong N, Rossow K, Culhane M, Goyal S, Collins J, Matthijnssens J, Ciarlet M. Rapid detection and high occurrence of porcine rotavirus a, B, and C by RT-qPCR in diagnostic samples. J Virol Methods. 2014;209:30–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim O, Chae C. In situ hybridization for the detection and localization of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in the intestinal tissues from naturally infected piglets. Vet Pathol. 2000;37(1):62–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Saif LJ, Pansaert MB, Sestak K, Yeo SG, Jung K. Coronaviruses. In: Zimmerman J, Karriker LA, Ramirez A, Schwartz KJ, Stevenson GW, editors. Diseases of swine. 10th ed: Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. p. 501–24.Google Scholar
  17. Carvajal A, Argüello H, Martínez-Lobo FJ, Costillas S, Miranda R, de Nova PJ G, Rubio P. Porcine epidemic diarrhoea: new insights into an old disease. Porcine Health Manag. 2015;1:12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Stevenson GW, Hoang H, Schwartz KJ, Burrough EB, Sun D, Madson D, Cooper VL, Pillatzki A, Gauger P, Schmitt BJ. Emergence of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in the United States: clinical signs, lesions, and viral genomic sequences. J Vet Diagn Investig. 2013;25(5):649–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaper JB, Nataro JP, Mobley HL. Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nature Reviews Microbiol. 2004;2(2):123–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Alexander TJL. Neonatal diarrhoea in pigs. In: Gyles CL, editor. Escherichia coli In domestic animals and humans. Wallingford: CAB International; 1994. p. 151–70.Google Scholar
  21. Fairbrother JM, Gyles CL. Colibacillosis. In: Zimmerman J, Karriker LA, Ramirez A, Schwartz KJ, Stevenson GW, editors. Diseases of Swine. 10th ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. p. 723–49.Google Scholar
  22. Songer GJ. Clostridiosis. In: Zimmerman J, Karriker LA, Ramirez A, Schwartz KJ, Stevenson GW, editors. Diseases of swine. 10th ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. p. 709–22.Google Scholar
  23. Morin M, Phaneuf JB, Malo R. Clostridium perfringens type C enteritis in a Quebec swine herd. Can Vet J. 1981;22(3):58.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Petri D, Hill J, Van Kessel A. Microbial succession in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of the preweaned pig. Livest Sci. 2010;133(1):107–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Jandu N, Ho NKL, Donato KA, Karmali MA, Mascarenhas M, Duffy SP, Tailor C, Sherman P. Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 gene expression profiling in response to growth in the presence of host epithelia. 2009; 4(3):e4889.Google Scholar
  26. Lee SI, Kang SG, Kang ML, Yoo HS. Development of multiplex polymerase chain reaction assys for detecting enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and their application to field isolates from piglets with diarrea. J Vet Diagn Investig. 2008;20:492–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Unterweger C, Kahler A, Gerlach GF, Viehmann M, von AA, Hennig-Pauka I. Administration of non-pathogenic isolates of Escherichia coli and Clostridium perfringens type a to piglets in a herd affected with a high incidence of neonatal diarrhoea. Animal. 2016 August;30:1–7.Google Scholar
  28. Baums CG, Schotte U, Amtsberg G, Goethe R. Diagnostic multiplex PCR for toxin genotyping of Clostridium Perfringens isolates. Vet Microbiol. 2004;100(1–2):11–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pang Xiaoli L. Bonita lee, Nasim Boroumand, Barbara Leblanc, Jutta K. Preiksaitis, Charlotte C, Yu Ip. Increased detection of rotavirus using a real time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay in stool specimens from children with diarrhea. J Med Virol. 2004;72:496–501.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Le Dividich J, Noblet J. Colostrum intake and thermoregulation in the neonatal pig in relation to environmental temperature. Biol Neonate. 1981;40(3–4):167–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pedersen LJ, Malmkvist J, Kammersgaard T, Jorgensen E. Avoiding hypothermia in neonatal pigs: effect of duration of floor heating at different room temperatures. J Anim Sci. 2013;91(1):425–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Martineau GP, Vaillancourt JP, Broes A. Principal neonatal diseases. In: Varley MA, editor. The neonatal pig- development and survival. Wallingford: CAB International; 1995. p. 239–64.Google Scholar
  33. Katsuda K, Kohmoto M, Kawashima K, Tsunemitsu H. Frequency of enteropathogen detection in suckling and weaned pigs with diarrhea in Japan. J Vet Diagn Investig. 2006;18(4):350–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Chan G, Farzan A, DeLay J, McEwen B, Prescott JF, Friendship RM. A retrospective study on the etiological diagnoses of diarrhea in neonatal piglets in Ontario, Canada, between 2001 and 2010. Can J Vet Res. 2013;77(4):254–60. (7)PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Boniotti MB, Papetti A, Lavazza A, Alborali G, Sozzi E, Chiapponi C, Faccini S, Bonilauri P, Cordioli P, Marthaler D. Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus and discovery of a recombinant swine enteric Coronavirus. Italy Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22(1):83–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Pensaert MB, Martelli P. Porcine epidemic diarrhea: a retrospect from Europe and matters of debate. Virus Res. 2016;226:1–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ngeleka M, Pritchard J, Appleyard G, Middleton D, Fairbrother JM. Isolation and association of Escherichia coli AIDA-I/STb, rather than EAST1 pathotype, with diarrhea in piglets and antibiotic sensitivity of isolates. J Vet Diagn Investig. 2003;15(3):242–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Alustiza FE, Picco NY, Bellingeri RV, Terzolo HR, Vivas AB. Frequency of virulence genes of Escherichia coli among newborn piglets from an intensive pig farm in Argentina. Rev Argent Microbiol. 2012;44(4):250–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Wada Y, Kato M, Yamamoto S, Shibahara T, Ishikawa Y, Kadota K. Invasive ability of Escherichia coli O18 isolated from swine neonatal diarrhea. Vet Pathol. 2004;41(4):433–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kongsted H, Jonach B, Haugegaard S, Angen Ø, Jorsal SE, Kokotovic B, Larsen LE, Jensen TK, Nielsen JP. Microbiological, pathological and histological findings in four Danish pig herds affected by a new neonatal diarrhoea syndrome. BMC Vet Res. 2013;9:206.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Larsson J, Aspán A, Lindberg R, Grandon R, Båverud V, Fall N, Jacobson M. Pathological and bacteriological characterization of neonatal porcine diarrhoea of uncertain aetiology. J Med Microbiol. 2015;64(8):916–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Dors A, Czyżewska-Dors E, Wasyl D, Pomorska-Mól M. Prevalence and factors associated with the occurrence of bacterial enteropathogens in suckling piglets in farrow-to-finish herds. Vet Rec. 2016;179(23):598.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Springer S, Finzel J, Florian V, Schoepe H, Woitow G, Selbitz HJ. Vorkommen und Bekämpfung des Clostridium-perfringens-Typ-A-assoziierten Durchfalls der Saugferkel unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Immunprophylaxe. Tierärztl Prax. 2012;40(G):375—82.Google Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement